Canada Gazette, Part I, Volume 146, Number 26: COMMISSIONS
June 30, 2012
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY
CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT
Replacement class screening report — Minor repairs to transportation infrastructure in Atlantic Canada National Parks — Public notice
The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) declares that minor repairs to transportation infrastructure in Atlantic Canada National Parks contained in the Parks Canada Replacement Class Screening Report (RCSR) no longer need to undergo individual environmental assessments.
Parks Canada has conducted a replacement class screening which consists of a single environmental assessment of projects within a class. The details of this replacement class screening are provided in the RCSR on minor repairs to transportation infrastructure in Atlantic Canada National Parks.
Public consultation on the RCSR took place from March 14 to April 12, 2012. The Agency received no written submissions from the public during this period. It has reviewed the RCSR and has determined that the project screening process, as described in the document, meets the requirements of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (the Act) for the environmental assessment of this particular class of projects. It is also the Agency’s opinion that the class of projects described in the RCSR is not likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects when the design standards and mitigation measures described in the report are applied.
The declaration is effective June 8, 2012, and is subject to certain conditions, including the following:
- The Agency agrees with Parks Canada that the declaration is valid until June 7, 2017;
- The Agency will place the RCSR in the Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry (the Registry) at www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca; and
- On a quarterly basis, Parks Canada will post on the Registry a statement of the projects for which the RCSR was applied, as required under the Act.
For further information, the public may contact the Class Screening Manager, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3, 613-960-0277 or 1-866-582-1884 (telephone), 613-957-0946 (fax), ClassScreening@ceaa-acee.gc.ca (email).
[26-1-o]
CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL
APPEAL
Notice No. HA-2012-006
The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) will hold a public hearing to consider the appeal referenced hereunder. The hearing will be held beginning at 9:30 a.m., in the Tribunal’s Hearing Room No. 2, 18th Floor, 333 Laurier Avenue W, Ottawa, Ontario. Interested persons planning to attend should contact the Tribunal at 613-998-9908 to obtain further information and to confirm that the hearing will be held as scheduled.
Customs Act
Cycles Lambert Inc. v. President of the Canada Border Services Agency
Date of Hearing: July 31, 2012
Appeal No.: AP-2011-060
Goods in Issue: Various models of bicycle trainers
Issues: Whether the goods in issue are properly classified under tariff item No. 9506.91.90 as other articles and equipment for general physical exercise, gymnastics or athletics, as determined by the President of the Canada Border Services Agency, or should be classified under tariff item No. 9506.91.10 as exercise bicycles, or, in the alternative, under tariff item No. 8714.99.90 as other parts and accessories of vehicles of heading Nos. 87.11 to 87.13, and whether the goods in issue are entitled to the benefit of tariff item No. 9948.00.00 as articles for use in automatic data processing machines and units thereof, as claimed by Cycles Lambert Inc.
Tariff Items at Issue: Cycles Lambert Inc.—9506.91.10 or 8714.99.90 and 9948.00.00
President of the Canada Border Services Agency—9506.91.90
June 22, 2012
By order of the Tribunal
DOMINIQUE LAPORTE
Secretary
[26-1-o]
CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL
DETERMINATION
Liquid dielectric transformers
Notice is hereby given that, on June 22, 2012, pursuant to subsection 37.1(1) of the Special Import Measures Act, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal determined that there was evidence that disclosed a reasonable indication that the dumping of liquid dielectric transformers having a top power handling capacity equal to or exceeding 60 000 kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), whether assembled or unassembled, complete or incomplete, originating in or exported from the Republic of Korea, had caused injury or was threatening to cause injury (Member Downey dissenting) [Preliminary Injury Inquiry No. PI-2012-001].
Ottawa, June 22, 2012
GILLIAN BURNETT
Acting Secretary
[26-1-o]
CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE TRIBUNAL
RECOMMENCEMENT OF EXPIRY REVIEW
Refined sugar
On February 17, 2010, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) initiated, pursuant to subsection 76.03(3) of the Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), an expiry review (Expiry Review No. RR-2009-003R) of its orders made on November 2, 2005, in Expiry Review No. RR-2004-007, continuing, with amendment, its orders made on November 3, 2000, in Expiry Review No. RR-99-006, continuing, with amendment, its findings made on November 6, 1995, in Inquiry No. NQ-95-002, concerning the dumping of refined sugar, refined from sugar cane or sugar beets, in granulated, liquid and powdered form (refined sugar), originating in or exported from the United States of America (United States), Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany (Germany), the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, and the subsidizing of refined sugar originating in or exported from the European Union (the subject goods).
On June 17, 2010, the Canada Border Services Agency determined, pursuant to paragraph 76.03(7)(a) of SIMA, that the expiry of the orders made by the Tribunal on November 2, 2005, would likely result in the continuation or resumption of dumping and subsidizing of the subject goods.
On November 1, 2010, the Tribunal determined, pursuant to subsection 76.03(10) of SIMA, that the expiry of its order made on November 2, 2005, in respect of the dumping of refined sugar originating in or exported from the United States (the U.S. order) would likely result in injury to the domestic industry but that the expiry of its order made on November 2, 2005, in respect of the dumping of refined sugar originating in or exported from Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom and the subsidizing of refined sugar originating in or exported from the European Union (the EU order) would not likely result in injury to the domestic industry. The Tribunal therefore made an order, pursuant to paragraph 76.03(12)(b), continuing the U.S. order and made another order, pursuant to subparagraph 76.03(12)(a)(ii), rescinding the EU order.
The Tribunal’s order rescinding the EU order was the subject of an application for judicial review to the Federal Court of Appeal (File No. A-461-10). On May 30, 2012, the Federal Court of Appeal allowed the application for judicial review, set aside the Tribunal’s order and returned the matter to the Tribunal for reconsideration.
The Tribunal therefore gives notice that it will recommence the expiry review of the EU order. Any firm, organization, person or government wishing to participate in this proceeding must file a notice of participation with the Secretary on or before July 3, 2012. Each counsel who intends to represent a party in this proceeding must file a notice of representation, as well as a declaration and undertaking, with the Secretary on or before July 3, 2012.
This expiry review proceeding will be conducted by way of written submissions. Any party wishing to file a submission must do so no later than July 17, 2012. Parties wishing to respond to the submissions must do so no later than July 31, 2012.
All submissions must be filed with the Tribunal in 25 copies.
In accordance with section 46 of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, a person who provides information to the Tribunal and who wishes some or all of the information to be kept confidential must, among other things, submit a non-confidential edited version or summary of the information designated as confidential, or a statement indicating why such a version or summary cannot be made.
Written submissions, correspondence and requests for information regarding this notice should be addressed to the Secretary, Canadian International Trade Tribunal, 333 Laurier Avenue W, 15th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G7, 613-993-3595 (telephone), 613-990-2439 (fax), secretary@citt-tcce.gc.ca (email).
Further details regarding this expiry review proceeding are contained in the document entitled “Additional Information”, which is appended to the notice of recommencement of expiry review, Expiry Review No. RR-2009-003R, available on the Tribunal’s Web site at www.citt-tcce.gc.ca.
Ottawa, June 18, 2012
DOMINIQUE LAPORTE
Secretary
[26-1-o]
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES
The Commission posts on its Web site the decisions, notices of consultation and regulatory policies that it publishes, as well as information bulletins and orders. On April 1, 2011, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure came into force. As indicated in Part 1 of these Rules, some broadcasting applications are posted directly on the Commission’s Web site, www.crtc.gc.ca, under “Part 1 Applications.”
To be up to date on all ongoing proceedings, it is important to regularly consult “Today’s Releases” on the Commission’s Web site, which includes daily updates to notices of consultation that have been published and ongoing proceedings, as well as a link to Part 1 applications.
The following documents are abridged versions of the Commission’s original documents. The original documents contain a more detailed outline of the applications, including the locations and addresses where the complete files for the proceeding may be examined. These documents are posted on the Commission’s Web site and may also be examined at the Commission’s offices and public examination rooms. Furthermore, all documents relating to a proceeding, including the notices and applications, are posted on the Commission’s Web site under “Public Proceedings.”
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
PART 1 APPLICATIONS
The following applications were posted on the Commission’s Web site between June 15, 2012, and June 21, 2012:
Bell Media Inc.
Hamilton, Burlington, and Oakville, Ontario
2012-0704-3
Addition of a transmitter for CKVR-DT
Deadline for submission of interventions, comments and/or answers: July 16, 2012
Ontario French Language Educational Communications Authority
Pembroke, Lac-Ste-Thérèse, Hawkesbury, and Sudbury, Ontario
2012-0739-0
Deletion of CHLF-TV-1, CHLF-TV-2, CHLF-TV-6, and CHLF-TV-13 transmitters
Deadline for submission of interventions, comments and/or answers: July 23, 2012
[26-1-o]
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
DECISIONS
The complete texts of the decisions summarized below are available from the offices of the CRTC.
2012-339 June 21, 2012
Rogers Broadcasting Limited
Province of Saskatchewan
Approved — Application for authority to acquire from Bluepoint Investments Inc. the assets of Saskatchewan Communications Network, a satellite-to-cable programming undertaking that broadcasts educational programming in Saskatchewan, and for a new broadcasting licence to continue the operation of the undertaking.
2012-341 June 22, 2012
Various radio programming undertakings
Across Canada
Renewed — Broadcasting licences for the radio stations set out in the appendix to the decision from September 1 to November 30, 2012.
2012-342 June 22, 2012
Bell Aliant Regional Communications Inc., (the general partner), as well as limited partner with 6583458 Canada Inc. (the limited partners), carrying on business as Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Greater Sudbury, Ontario
Approved — Application for a regional broadcasting licence to operate a terrestrial broadcasting distribution undertaking to serve Greater Sudbury.
2012-343 June 22, 2012
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Edmonton, Alberta
Approved — Application for a broadcasting licence to operate a French-language FM radio station in Edmonton, to replace its AM station CHFA Edmonton.
Approved — Application to modify the technical parameters of the transmitters CBCX-FM-1 Edmonton and CHFA-10-FM Edmonton.
[26-1-o]
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW COMMISSION
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INFORMATION REVIEW ACT
Filing of a claim for exemption
Pursuant to paragraph 12(1)(a) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, the Chief Screening Officer of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission hereby gives notice of the receipt of the claims for exemption listed below.
| Claimant | Subject of the Claim for Exemption | Product Identifier (As shown on the MSDS) | Registry Number |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canyon Technical Services, Calgary, Alberta | Chemical name, common name, generic name, trade name or brand name of a controlled product and information that could be used to identify a supplier of a controlled product | CAN-LTC | 8622 |
The above claim seeks exemption from the disclosure of employer confidential information in respect of a controlled product which would otherwise be required to be disclosed by the provisions of the applicable provincial legislation relating to occupational health and safety.
| Claimant | Subject of the Claim for Exemption | Product Identifier (As shown on the MSDS) | Registry Number |
|---|---|---|---|
| E.I. du Pont Canada Company, Mississauga, Ontario | Chemical identity of one ingredient | Capstone FS-3100 | 8585 |
| Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey | Chemical identity of two ingredients | BR® 100 Adhesive - Part A | 8586 |
| Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey | Chemical identity of three ingredients | BR® 100 Adhesive, Part B | 8587 |
| Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey | Chemical identity of five ingredients | BR® 6747-1 Water Based Primer, 20-40% Solids | 8588 |
| Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey | Chemical identity of one ingredient | AEROSOL® OT-NV Surfactant | 8589 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario | Chemical identity of one ingredient | 3M(TM) AUTOMIX(TM) PANEL BONDING ADHESIVE, PART A | 8590 |
| Wax Busters Ltd., Calgary, Alberta | Chemical identity of one ingredient | WB-34 | 8591 |
| Pristiva Inc., Overland Park, Kansas | Chemical identity of one ingredient | Pristiva Activator | 8592 |
| Pristiva Inc., Overland Park, Kansas | Chemical identity of four ingredients | Pristiva Primer | 8593 |
| Ashland Inc., Dublin, Ohio | Chemical identity of one ingredient | PURERAD 19794 CAT COLD FOIL ADH | 8594 |
| Momentive Performance Materials, Markham, Ontario | Chemical identity of one ingredient | Niax* catalyst A-330 | 8595 |
| Momentive Performance Materials, Markham, Ontario | Chemical identity of two ingredients | Niax* silicone L-650 | 8596 |
| Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario | Chemical identity of three ingredients | NALCO® EC6595A | 8597 |
| Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey | Chemical identity of one ingredient | EBECRYL® 350 radiation curing resin | 8598 |
| Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey | Chemical identity of one ingredient | EBECRYL® 220 radiation curing resins | 8599 |
| Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey | Chemical identity of two ingredients | EBECRYL® 450 radiation curing resins | 8600 |
| Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey | Chemical identity of one ingredient | EBECRYL® 1290 radiation curing resins | 8601 |
| Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey | Chemical identity of one ingredient | EBECRYL® 8301 radiation curing resins | 8602 |
| Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey | Chemical identity of one ingredient | EBECRYL® 83 radiation curing resins | 8603 |
| Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey | Chemical identity of one ingredient | EBECRYL® 3708 radiation curing resins | 8604 |
| Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey | Chemical identity of one ingredient | EBECRYL® 40 radiation curing resins | 8605 |
| GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario | Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient | PREDATOR 3800 | 8606 |
| GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario | Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient | PREDATOR 3801 | 8607 |
| GE Water & Process Technologies Canada, Oakville, Ontario | Chemical identity and concentration of one ingredient | THERMOFLO 7012 | 8608 |
| Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey | Chemical identity of two ingredients | BR®1009-8 Tack Primer | 8609 |
| Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois | Chemical identity of three ingredients | REDICOTE® C-3082 | 8610 |
| Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry LLC, Chicago, Illinois | Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients | REDISET® LQ-1102C | 8611 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario | Chemical identity of two ingredients | 3M(TM) SCREEN PRINTABLE ADHESIVE SP-7555 | 8612 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario | Chemical identity of one ingredient | 3M(TM) DEVELOPMENTAL MATERIAL AHS-1519 | 8613 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario | Chemical identity of two ingredients | 3M(TM) DEVELOPMENTAL MATERIAL AHS-1518 | 8614 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario | Chemical identity of one ingredient | 3M(TM) DEVELOPMENTAL MATERIAL AHS-1523 | 8615 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario | Chemical identity of two ingredients | 3M(TM) DEVELOPMENTAL MATERIAL AHS-1522 | 8616 |
| CRI/Criterion Inc., Houston, Texas | Chemical identity of two ingredients | CRITERION CENTERA(TM) DN-3651 CATALYST | 8617 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario | Chemical identity of one ingredient | 3M(TM) Stamark(TM) Low VOC Surface Preparation Adhesive SPA60 Cylinder Spray | 8618 |
| Stepan Company, Northfield, Illinois | Chemical identity of three ingredients | AGENT 3133-35 | 8619 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario | Chemical identity of one ingredient | 3M(TM) Dynatron Liquid Hardener 609 | 8620 |
| 3M Canada Company, London, Ontario | Chemical identity of one ingredient | 3M(TM) Bondo Traffic MEKP Hardener 5, 7 | 8621 |
| Nalco Canada Co., Burlington, Ontario | Chemical identity of one ingredient | NALCO® EC1021A | 8623 |
| Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, New Jersey | Chemical identity of one ingredient | EBECRYL® 8411 radiation curing resins | 8624 |
| BWA Water Additives US LLC, Tucker, Georgia | Chemical identity of two ingredients | DP3562 | 8625 |
| BWA Water Additives US LLC, Tucker, Georgia | Chemical identity of one ingredient | BELCLENE 440 | 8626 |
| Stepan Company, Northfield, Illinois | Chemical identity of two ingredients | TOXIMUL 3404F | 8627 |
| Stepan Company, Northfield, Illinois | Chemical identity of four ingredients | AGENT 2337-92A | 8628 |
| Stepan Company, Northfield, Illinois | Chemical identity of four ingredients | AGENT 2337-92N | 8629 |
| E.I. du Pont Canada Company, Mississauga, Ontario | Chemical identity of two ingredients | Dupont(TM) Cyrel(R) Cylosol Plate Washout Solution 2012 | 8630 |
| Abressa Canada Inc., Saint-Sébastien-de-Frontenac, Quebec | Chemical identity and concentration of five ingredients | Glossex | 8631 |
| Abressa Canada Inc., Saint-Sébastien-de-Frontenac, Quebec | Chemical identity and concentration of five ingredients | Porox/Resipox | 8632 |
| Abressa Canada Inc., Saint-Sébastien-de-Frontenac, Quebec | Chemical identity and concentration of four ingredients | SYNTER | 8633 |
| Afton Chemical Corporation, Richmond, Virginia | Chemical identity of seven ingredients | HiTEC 598 Performance Additive | 8634 |
| Chevron Oronite Company LLC, Bellaire, Texas | Chemical identity of one ingredient | LUBAD 1296 | 8635 |
| Dequest AG, Zug, Switzerland | Chemical identity of two ingredients | SPE 0108 | 8636 |
| Dequest AG, Zug, Switzerland | Chemical identity of two ingredients | SPE 0001 | 8637 |
| Innospec Fuel Specialties, Newark, Delaware | Chemical identity of one ingredient | Oil Color IAR Liquid Dye | 8638 |
| Dow Corning Corporation, Midland, Michigan | Chemical identity of one ingredient | MOLYKOTE(R) D-96-NTP | 8639 |
| Rohm and Haas Canada LP, West Hill, Ontario | Chemical identity and concentration of three ingredients | PARALOID™ KM-4400 | 8640 |
| MeadWestvaco Corp. Specialty Chemicals Div., North Charleston, South Carolina | Chemical identity of three ingredients | PC-1802 | 8641 |
| MeadWestvaco Corp. Specialty Chemicals Div., North Charleston, South Carolina | Chemical identity of one ingredient | POLYFAC™ E-660 | 8642 |
| MeadWestvaco Corp. Specialty Chemicals Div., North Charleston, South Carolina | Chemical identity of one ingredient | POLYFAC™ T-653HA | 8643 |
| MeadWestvaco Corp. Specialty Chemicals Div., North Charleston, South Carolina | Chemical identity of one ingredient | POLYFAC™ T-653 | 8644 |
| MeadWestvaco Corp. Specialty Chemicals Div., North Charleston, South Carolina | Chemical identity of one ingredient | POLYFAC™ T-703 | 8645 |
The above claims seek exemption from the disclosure of supplier confidential business information in respect of a controlled product; such disclosure would otherwise be required under the provisions of the Hazardous Products Act.
Subsection 12(2) of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act requires that this notice contain a statement offering every affected party the opportunity to make written representations to the screening officer with respect to the claim for exemption and the material safety data sheet to which it relates.
Under the provisions of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Regulations, “affected party,” for purposes of the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, means, in respect of a controlled product that is the subject of a claim for exemption, a person who is not a competitor of the claimant and who uses, supplies or is otherwise involved in the use or supply of the controlled product at a work place, and includes
- (a) a supplier of the controlled product;
- (b) an employee at the work place;
- (c) an employer at the work place;
- (d) a safety and health professional for the work place;
- (e) a safety and health representative or a member of a safety and health committee for the work place; and
- (f) a person who is authorized in writing to represent
- (i) a supplier referred to in paragraph (a) or an employer referred to in paragraph (c), or
- (ii) an employee referred to in paragraph (b), except where that person is an official or a representative of a trade union that is not certified or recognized in respect of the work place.
Written representations respecting a claim for exemption cited in the present notice, or the material safety data sheet to which the claim relates, must cite the appropriate registry number, state the reasons and evidence upon which the representations are based and be delivered within 30 days of the date of the publication of this notice in the Canada Gazette, Part Ⅰ, to the screening officer at the following address: Hazardous Materials Information Review Commission, 427 Laurier Avenue W, 7th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1M3.
G. BRUINS
Acting Chief Screening Officer
[26-1-o]
INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION
BOUNDARY WATERS TREATY OF 1909
Public hearings on Lake Superior Regulation
The International Joint Commission (IJC) is inviting public comment on the final report of its International Upper Great Lakes Study Board, Lake Superior Regulation: Addressing Uncertainty in Upper Great Lakes Water Levels. Comments will be accepted at public hearings and by mail, email and on-line until August 31, 2012.
The report examines whether the regulation of outflows from Lake Superior through the compensating works and power dams on the St. Marys River at Sault Ste. Marie might be improved to take into consideration the evolving needs of users on lakes Superior, Huron, Michigan and Erie. The report also examines the potential future impacts of climate change, a management strategy to better anticipate and respond to future extreme water levels, the feasibility and implications of restoring water levels in lakes Michigan and Huron and multi-lake regulation and its impacts throughout the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence system. The report and related supporting documents and peer review are available at the Upper Great Lakes Public Hearings Web site.
Commissioners invite the public to present comments at hearings that will be held at the following dates and locations:
| Monday, July 9 | Tuesday, July 10 | Wednesday, July 11 |
Thursday, July 12 |
|---|---|---|---|
Sarnia, ON |
Grosse Pointe Farms, MI |
Port Clinton, OH |
Holland, MI |
Thunder Bay, ON |
Duluth, MN |
Fish Creek, WI |
Milwaukee, WI |
Saturday,
|
Sunday, July 15 | Monday, July 16 | Tuesday, July 17 |
|---|---|---|---|
Sault Ste. Marie, ON |
Little Current, ON |
Parry Sound, ON Midland, ON |
Collingwood, ON |
Video conference technology will be used to link the hearings scheduled from July 9 to 12 and to allow the participation of some commissioners from other locations.
Two teleconferences will be held for those people who are not able to attend the meetings. One will be held in English and the other in French. Details of the teleconferences will be provided in a subsequent news release.
Written comments may be submitted to the IJC for receipt by August 31, 2012, from the Upper Great Lakes Public Hearings Web site or to either address below:
U.S. Section Secretary
International Joint Commission
200 L Street NW, Suite 615
Washington, DC 20440
Fax: 202-632-2006
Email: commission@washington.ijc.org
Canadian Section Secretary
International Joint Commission
234 Laurier Avenue W, 22nd Floor
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6K6
Fax: 613-993-5583
Email: commission@ottawa.ijc.org
Technical questions should be sent in writing to the Commission if a detailed response is expected.
The International Joint Commission was established under the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 to help the United States and Canada prevent and resolve disputes over the use of the waters the two countries share. Its responsibilities include considering applications for projects that affect the natural levels and flows of boundary waters. For more information, visit the Commission’s Web site at www.ijc.org.
[26-1-o]
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYMENT ACT
Permission granted
The Public Service Commission of Canada, pursuant to section 116 of the Public Service Employment Act, hereby gives notice that it has granted permission, pursuant to subsection 115(2) of the said Act, to Brian Hyland, Explosives Inspector (SG-SRE-4), Department of Natural Resources, Western Region, Calgary, Alberta, to be a candidate, before and during the election period, for the position of Councillor for the Town of Canmore, Alberta, in a municipal by-election to be held on June 19, 2012.
June 19, 2012
KATHY NAKAMURA
Director General
Political Activities and
Non-Partisanship Directorate
[26-1-o]